Skip to content

silverfast.com

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
45.5
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#204,879

▲ 3,940

Rank in TLD
#86,610

▲ 1,024

Referring Domains
319

▲ 47

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
28.4
Subdomains
9
Domain age
27 yr 5 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
wikipedia.org91.8#34
adobe.com90.7#43
wikimedia.org85.2#150
canada.ca80.9#397
indiana.edu71.8#2,414
narod.ru71.8#2,456
tomsguide.com71.2#2,727
impress.co.jp70.0#3,362
honoluluadvertiser.com69.6#3,599
qt.io68.6#4,298

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
18 May 1999
Last updated
20 Apr 2026
Expires
18 May 2027 (194 days remaining)
Domain statuses
ok
Registrar
Deutsche Telekom AG

Subdomain

blog.silverfast.combusiness.silverfast.comforum.silverfast.comhelpcenter.silverfast.commy.silverfast.comrunway.silverfast.comstatic.silverfast.comwww.silverfast.comwww3.silverfast.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Asilverfast.com3600217.6.73.195
MXsilverfast.com36005 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
MXsilverfast.com36005 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
MXsilverfast.com36001 aspmx.l.google.com
MXsilverfast.com360010 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
MXsilverfast.com360010 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
NSsilverfast.com43200ns1.telekom.net
NSsilverfast.com43200pns.dtag.de
SOAsilverfast.com43200pns.dtag.de. dns.telekom.de. 2026091600 10800 3600 2419200 3600
TXTsilverfast.com3600v=spf1 mx a ip4:217.6.73.199/28 include:_spf.google.com include:eu.zcsend.net include:spf.zoho.eu include:eu.transmail.net ~all
TXTsilverfast.com3600_t0y7mi3fgnodct1ro1ua12wc2428hra

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.