shivam.dev
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #3,762,647
▲ 910,667
- Rank in TLD
- #11,956
▲ 1,463
- Referring Domains
- 9
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 42.3
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 42.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 39.8
- Referring Domains
- 9
- Linked Domains
- 64
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 1
20–29 0
30–39 3
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 9
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| habr.com | 70.0 | #3,363 |
| fossunited.org | 46.1 | #187,102 |
| rubyweekly.com | 45.1 | #218,447 |
| codeminer42.com | 39.8 | #495,342 |
| shortruby.com | 33.7 | #1,227,325 |
| panoptic.in | 30.9 | #1,906,413 |
| linksfor.dev | 13.0 | #26,295,671 |
| serv-my.ru | 8.4 | #50,871,568 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .dev
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
archive.shivam.devgo.shivam.devjoy.shivam.devwww.shivam.dev
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | shivam.dev | 300 | 76.76.21.21 |
| MX | shivam.dev | 300 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | shivam.dev | 300 | 10 aspmx2.googlemail.com |
| MX | shivam.dev | 300 | 10 aspmx3.googlemail.com |
| MX | shivam.dev | 300 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | shivam.dev | 86400 | naya.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | shivam.dev | 86400 | sevki.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | shivam.dev | 1800 | naya.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2419077058 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | shivam.dev | 300 | google-site-verification=O1AT_XoqpCRlBa1pdkQCrJ-WcoRiFpMGv7uDVWFO06s |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.