sharedbookmark.net
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #42,566,730
▲ 2,282,901
- Rank in TLD
- #1,304,855
▲ 82,880
- Referring Domains
- 7
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.4
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 6 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.7
- Referring Domains
- 7
- Linked Domains
- 1,106
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 2
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 1
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 7
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| bgsu.edu | 62.4 | #11,505 |
| bizidex.com | 50.6 | #87,612 |
| mu.nu | 49.5 | #105,491 |
| bellebooksx.blogspot.com | 18.7 | #12,061,318 |
| trick-bike.com | 12.8 | #27,037,590 |
| eventsmarketing.us | 9.5 | #43,316,344 |
| fretsoup.com | 9.2 | #44,947,082 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 24 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 24 Feb 2027 (111 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
www.sharedbookmark.net
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | sharedbookmark.net | 3600 | 15.204.130.151 |
| MX | sharedbookmark.net | 3600 | 0 mx.sharedbookmark.net.cust.hostedemail.com |
| NS | sharedbookmark.net | 3600 | ns5.seekaappcontrol.com |
| NS | sharedbookmark.net | 3600 | ns6.seekaappcontrol.com |
| SOA | sharedbookmark.net | 3600 | ns5.seekaappcontrol.com. server-admin.seekahost.app. 2025101001 3600 1800 604800 3600 |
| TXT | sharedbookmark.net | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.hostedemail.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
A mail server hostname could not be resolved to an IP address.
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.