sfcontent.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 10 years ago. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #1,546,743
▲ 236,236
- Rank in TLD
- #645,907
▲ 87,608
- Referring Domains
- 18
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 17 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.1
- Referring Domains
- 18
- Linked Domains
- 49
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 4
20–29 4
30–39 6
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 18
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| apple.com | 93.5 | #22 |
| saashub.com | 58.4 | #23,357 |
| endoexpert.ru | 37.3 | #694,814 |
| star-force.com | 37.1 | #711,906 |
| waerfa.com | 36.5 | #771,181 |
| infobezopasnost.ru | 32.7 | #1,470,587 |
| sitebs.ru | 32.1 | #1,605,414 |
| safensoft.com | 30.0 | #2,204,452 |
| star-force.ru | 29.8 | #2,309,697 |
| p-reliz.ru | 28.4 | #2,868,758 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 26 Feb 2009
- Last updated
- 11 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 26 Feb 2027 (113 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Regional Network Information Center, JSC dba RU-CENTER
Subdomain
www.sfcontent.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | sfcontent.com | 3600 | 87.242.83.72 |
| NS | sfcontent.com | 3600 | ns1.hosting.reg.ru |
| NS | sfcontent.com | 3600 | ns2.hosting.reg.ru |
| SOA | sfcontent.com | 3600 | sm19.hosting.reg.ru. support.reg.ru. 2025071853 10800 3600 604800 86400 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.