senf.space
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low. This domain was registered at least three years ago. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #4,259,829
▲ 889,094
- Rank in TLD
- #2,312
▲ 479
- Referring Domains
- 5
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.4
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 8 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.3
- Referring Domains
- 5
- Linked Domains
- 47
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 1
20–29 2
30–39 0
40–49 1
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 5
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| datenspuren.de | 40.1 | #477,550 |
| bunt.social | 28.5 | #2,839,993 |
| halle.it | 26.3 | #3,938,751 |
| rechenwerk-halle.de | 19.8 | #9,990,006 |
| rechenwerk.org | 7.5 | #57,654,579 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .space
- Registration date
- 22 Sept 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 22 Sept 2027 (321 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- Radix Technologies Inc.
- Registrar
- TUCOWS.COM, CO.
Subdomain
rechenwerk.senf.space
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | senf.space | 300 | 171.22.79.251 |
| AAAA | senf.space | 300 | 2406:ef80:4:e9da::1 |
| MX | senf.space | 300 | 10 mail.senf.space |
| NS | senf.space | 300 | third-dns.netcup.net |
| NS | senf.space | 300 | second-dns.netcup.net |
| NS | senf.space | 300 | root-dns.netcup.net |
| SOA | senf.space | 300 | root-dns.netcup.net. dnsadmin.netcup.net. 2026092517 28800 7200 1209600 300 |
| TXT | senf.space | 300 | v=spf1 a +mx +ip4:89.58.54.75 +ip6:2a03:4000:69:d17::1 -all |
| CAA | senf.space | 300 | 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.