screen.sc
- Domain Power ranking within .sc: #45
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This relatively new domain was registered less than three years ago. Only a small number of referring domains were found in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #707,358
▲ 69,820
- Rank in TLD
- #45
▲ 5
- Referring Domains
- 2
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 96.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 2 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 96.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 96.7
- Referring Domains
- 2
- Linked Domains
- 8
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 2
Total 2
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| apple.com | 93.5 | #22 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .scSeychelles
- Registration date
- 7 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 7 Jun 2027 (214 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VCS Pty Ltd
- Registrar
- VCS Pty Ltd
Subdomain
www.screen.sc
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | screen.sc | 900 | 104.248.192.226 |
| MX | screen.sc | 1800 | 1 SMTP.GOOGLE.COM |
| NS | screen.sc | 1800 | dns3.kuwaitnet.net |
| NS | screen.sc | 1800 | dns6.kuwaitnet.net |
| NS | screen.sc | 1800 | dns2.kuwaitnet.net |
| NS | screen.sc | 1800 | dns4.kuwaitnet.net |
| NS | screen.sc | 1800 | dns5.kuwaitnet.net |
| NS | screen.sc | 1800 | dns1.kuwaitnet.net |
| SOA | screen.sc | 3600 | dns1.kuwaitnet.net. hostmaster.kuwaitnet.net. 2026110501 1800 300 86400 300 |
| TXT | screen.sc | 1800 | google-site-verification=2U2FDf3YeFFBtVo8Pz2aBFJDMuyToSqYozAqk5naY0A |
| TXT | screen.sc | 1800 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.