scientific-computing.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #220,411
▲ 16,915
- Rank in TLD
- #93,013
▲ 6,115
- Referring Domains
- 310
▲ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.1
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 27 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 32.7
- Referring Domains
- 310
- Linked Domains
- 461
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 17
10–19 63
20–29 56
30–39 52
40–49 48
50–59 28
60–69 21
70–79 18
80–89 6
90–100 1
Total 310
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| line.me | 86.9 | #96 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| nist.gov | 82.9 | #261 |
| cornell.edu | 80.6 | #424 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| atlassian.net | 79.5 | #543 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
| utexas.edu | 77.4 | #796 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 20 Nov 1998
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Expires
- 19 Nov 2026 (14 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- ENOM, INC.
Subdomain
ftp.scientific-computing.comwww.scientific-computing.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | scientific-computing.com | 300 | 195.201.254.240 |
| NS | scientific-computing.com | 3600 | ns1.cammail.net |
| NS | scientific-computing.com | 3600 | ns2.cammail.net |
| SOA | scientific-computing.com | 120 | ns1.cammail.net. hostmaster.cammail.net. 2511034441 3600 600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | scientific-computing.com | 300 | v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com ip4:80.248.176.218 ip4:80.248.191.98 a:cluster-spf.netservers.net.uk include:msgfocus.com include:authsmtp.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.