scielo.pt
- Domain Power global ranking: #83,493
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data. It ranks within the top 100,000 in the global ranking.
- Global Rank
- #83,493
▲ 5,260
- Rank in TLD
- #157
▲ 11
- Referring Domains
- 316
▲ 12
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 5 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 35.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 34.1
- Referring Domains
- 316
- Linked Domains
- 2,188
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 25
10–19 52
20–29 53
30–39 51
40–49 55
50–59 49
60–69 24
70–79 2
80–89 3
90–100 2
Total 316
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| googleusercontent.com | 93.0 | #24 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| doi.org | 86.2 | #117 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| tinyurl.com | 84.1 | #186 |
| cutt.ly | 77.8 | #727 |
| usp.br | 71.7 | #2,477 |
| openedition.org | 69.1 | #4,027 |
| dublincore.org | 68.6 | #4,307 |
| diva-portal.org | 67.9 | #4,813 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ptPortugal
- Registration date
- 3 Nov 2021
- Expires
- 3 Nov 2026 (The published expiration date passed 2 days ago.)
- Domain statuses
- Registered
- Registry
- Associação DNS.PT
Subdomain
www.scielo.pt
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | scielo.pt | 300 | 193.137.197.37 |
| MX | scielo.pt | 300 | 10 smtp01.fccn.pt |
| MX | scielo.pt | 300 | 10 smtp02.fccn.pt |
| NS | scielo.pt | 86400 | ns02.fccn.pt |
| NS | scielo.pt | 86400 | ns01.fccn.pt |
| NS | scielo.pt | 86400 | ns03.fccn.pt |
| SOA | scielo.pt | 86400 | ns01.fccn.pt. dns-tec.fccn.pt. 2026102201 28800 7200 604800 14400 |
| TXT | scielo.pt | 300 | HARICA-vyCLPB9GTQtZKIGyq1r |
| TXT | scielo.pt | 300 | v=spf1 ip4:193.137.198.38 ip4:193.137.198.39 ip6:2001:690:2080:8005::38 ip6:2001:690:2080:8005::39 -all |
| TXT | scielo.pt | 300 | google-site-verification=ZPeQme1-aI0sTAV05uqLwiy5Uh5S-wFBcP-htL5mviw |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.