sbmfc.org.br
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #422,956
▲ 85,700
- Rank in TLD
- #3,784
▲ 809
- Referring Domains
- 231
▲ 13
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.7
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 27.5
- Referring Domains
- 231
- Linked Domains
- 618
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 27
10–19 51
20–29 47
30–39 36
40–49 30
50–59 24
60–69 9
70–79 4
80–89 2
90–100 1
Total 231
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| outlook.com | 86.2 | #119 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| www.gov.br | 79.9 | #502 |
| elpais.com | 76.0 | #1,043 |
| usp.br | 71.7 | #2,477 |
| ebsco.com | 70.7 | #2,976 |
| saude.gov.br | 67.5 | #5,138 |
| fiocruz.br | 65.3 | #7,153 |
| unesp.br | 64.4 | #8,152 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .brBrazil
- Domain statuses
- published
- Registry
- Comite Gestor da Internet no Brasil
Subdomain
eventos.sbmfc.org.brgo.sbmfc.org.brwww.loja.sbmfc.org.brwww.sbmfc.org.br
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | sbmfc.org.br | 14400 | 72.60.63.124 |
| AAAA | sbmfc.org.br | 14400 | 2a02:4780:66:f8e8::1 |
| MX | sbmfc.org.br | 14400 | 0 sbmfc-org-br.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | sbmfc.org.br | 86400 | ns1.dns-parking.com |
| NS | sbmfc.org.br | 86400 | ns2.dns-parking.com |
| SOA | sbmfc.org.br | 3600 | ns1.dns-parking.com. dns.hostinger.com. 2026110501 10000 2400 604800 600 |
| TXT | sbmfc.org.br | 14400 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:3983383456.agenciapr.net include:_spf.rdstation.com.br include:sendgrid.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.