safeql.dev
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #2,099,506
▲ 240,044
- Rank in TLD
- #6,784
▼ 24
- Referring Domains
- 17
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.8
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 4 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.5
- Referring Domains
- 17
- Linked Domains
- 13
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 2
20–29 6
30–39 1
40–49 3
50–59 1
60–69 2
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 17
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| prisma.io | 65.6 | #6,776 |
| zenn.dev | 65.4 | #7,013 |
| saashub.com | 58.4 | #23,357 |
| bytes.dev | 49.8 | #99,314 |
| bestofjs.org | 45.7 | #199,563 |
| nodeweekly.com | 44.3 | #250,504 |
| trackawesomelist.com | 38.9 | #561,354 |
| typeofweb.com | 29.5 | #2,427,677 |
| oeiuwq.com | 28.9 | #2,643,695 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .dev
- Registration date
- 9 Sept 2022
- Last updated
- 24 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 9 Sept 2027 (308 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- Charleston Road Registry Inc.
- Registrar
- Namecheap Inc.
Subdomain
www.safeql.dev
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | safeql.dev | 1799 | 76.76.21.21 |
| MX | safeql.dev | 1800 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | safeql.dev | 1800 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | safeql.dev | 1800 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | safeql.dev | 1800 | 10 aspmx2.googlemail.com |
| MX | safeql.dev | 1800 | 10 aspmx3.googlemail.com |
| NS | safeql.dev | 1800 | dns1.registrar-servers.com |
| NS | safeql.dev | 1800 | dns2.registrar-servers.com |
| SOA | safeql.dev | 3601 | dns1.registrar-servers.com. hostmaster.registrar-servers.com. 1790858906 43200 3600 604800 3601 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.