rus-linux.net
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #722,629
▼ 6,163
- Rank in TLD
- #24,281
▼ 15
- Referring Domains
- 527
▼ 89
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.9
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 3 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 16.4
- Referring Domains
- 527
- Linked Domains
- 5,114
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 110
10–19 230
20–29 104
30–39 35
40–49 23
50–59 15
60–69 3
70–79 4
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 527
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| mail.ru | 83.1 | #245 |
| atlassian.net | 79.5 | #543 |
| opensuse.org | 72.1 | #2,289 |
| narod.ru | 71.8 | #2,456 |
| habr.com | 70.0 | #3,363 |
| ya.ru | 69.5 | #3,725 |
| ucoz.com | 60.8 | #15,133 |
| lib.ru | 60.3 | #16,483 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 5 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Jul 2026
- Expires
- 30 Jul 2027 (267 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- OK
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- REGTIME LTD.
Subdomain
kanareikino.rus-linux.nettest.rus-linux.netwww.rus-linux.net
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rus-linux.net | 600 | 178.208.83.21 |
| MX | rus-linux.net | 600 | 10 mx1.rus-linux.net |
| MX | rus-linux.net | 600 | 10 mx2.rus-linux.net |
| NS | rus-linux.net | 600 | ns3.mchost.ru |
| NS | rus-linux.net | 600 | ns2.mchost.ru |
| NS | rus-linux.net | 600 | ns4.mchost.ru |
| NS | rus-linux.net | 600 | ns1.mchost.ru |
| SOA | rus-linux.net | 600 | ns1.mchost.ru. info.mchost.ru. 1792268643 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | rus-linux.net | 600 | v=spf1 a mx ip4:178.208.83.87 ip4:178.208.83.95 ip4:178.208.83.96 ~all |
| CAA | rus-linux.net | 600 | 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.