rsso.ch
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #2,324,130
▲ 84,713
- Rank in TLD
- #17,080
▲ 517
- Referring Domains
- 42
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 17 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.7
- Referring Domains
- 42
- Linked Domains
- 14
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 11
20–29 14
30–39 12
40–49 3
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 42
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| acm.org | 85.6 | #137 |
| chodilinh.com | 49.2 | #110,410 |
| waldorfschule.de | 48.6 | #122,650 |
| chobaolam.vn | 44.9 | #228,014 |
| eventyrcraft.net | 39.3 | #534,455 |
| thegoodland.vn | 36.0 | #843,811 |
| 天堂.world IDN | 34.2 | #1,136,728 |
| srotimes.com | 33.5 | #1,287,734 |
| helloprojectheaven.com | 33.5 | #1,286,040 |
| blutwoelfe.net | 33.3 | #1,354,950 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .chSwitzerland
- Registration date
- 28 Jun 2009
- Domain statuses
- active
Subdomain
www.forum.rsso.chwww.rsso.ch
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rsso.ch | 14400 | 31.220.121.183 |
| MX | rsso.ch | 3600 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | rsso.ch | 3600 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | rsso.ch | 3600 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | rsso.ch | 3600 | 10 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | rsso.ch | 3600 | 10 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | rsso.ch | 86400 | ns1.cyon.ch |
| NS | rsso.ch | 86400 | ns2.cyon.ch |
| SOA | rsso.ch | 14400 | ns1.cyon.ch. server.cyon.ch. 2024061607 14400 1800 1209600 3600 |
| TXT | rsso.ch | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:agenturserver.de ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.