rmf.is
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #2,037,615
▲ 193,814
- Rank in TLD
- #1,383
▲ 86
- Referring Domains
- 74
▼ 5
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.6
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 18 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 37.2
- Referring Domains
- 74
- Linked Domains
- 140
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 9
20–29 16
30–39 11
40–49 16
50–59 13
60–69 5
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 74
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| colostate.edu | 71.3 | #2,652 |
| diva-portal.org | 67.9 | #4,813 |
| uqam.ca | 66.1 | #6,326 |
| uibk.ac.at | 64.4 | #8,163 |
| elsevierpure.com | 62.4 | #11,506 |
| cbs.dk | 60.8 | #15,191 |
| coventry.ac.uk | 59.3 | #19,862 |
| hud.ac.uk | 57.7 | #26,460 |
| universityofgalway.ie | 57.6 | #27,183 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .isIceland
- Registration date
- 15 Sept 2008
- Expires
- 15 Sept 2027 (314 days remaining)
- Registry
- ISNIC - Internet á Íslandi hf.
Subdomain
24thnordicsymposium.rmf.is5iptrnconference.rmf.isiptrn.rmf.iswww.rmf.is
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rmf.is | 900 | 52.49.138.181 |
| AAAA | rmf.is | 900 | 2a05:d018:ed6:eb0c:52:49:138:181 |
| MX | rmf.is | 300 | 3600 rmf-is.mail.protection.outlook.com |
| NS | rmf.is | 86400 | dreki.unak.is |
| NS | rmf.is | 86400 | dns.unak.is |
| SOA | rmf.is | 86400 | dns.unak.is. hostmaster.dns.unak.is. 2021062701 28800 7200 604800 86400 |
| TXT | rmf.is | 300 | v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com ip4:130.208.224.0/24 ip4:130.208.228.0/24 ip4:172.26.8.0/30 include:_spf.email.stefna.is ip4:130.208.165.0/24 include:spf.emailsignatures365.com include:sogosurveys.com -all |
| TXT | rmf.is | 300 | MS=ms78094338 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.