rivva.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #430,391
▼ 56,190
- Rank in TLD
- #19,104
▼ 1,855
- Referring Domains
- 353
▼ 11
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.3
- Subdomains
- 18
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.5
- Referring Domains
- 353
- Linked Domains
- 2,078
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 57
20–29 109
30–39 94
40–49 43
50–59 21
60–69 10
70–79 2
80–89 3
90–100 0
Total 353
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| ionos.de | 81.7 | #332 |
| frontiersin.org | 80.3 | #465 |
| sueddeutsche.de | 74.5 | #1,411 |
| zeit.de | 73.9 | #1,570 |
| taz.de | 69.1 | #3,993 |
| pbworks.com | 67.8 | #4,918 |
| wikidot.com | 67.7 | #4,943 |
| ionos.es | 67.5 | #5,139 |
| hypotheses.org | 67.0 | #5,550 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2007
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
about.rivva.deaccount.rivva.deapps.rivva.deassets.rivva.deblog.rivva.decommunity.rivva.dedaten.rivva.defollow.rivva.deherz.rivva.deiphone.rivva.dem.rivva.deoh.rivva.derails.rivva.dereader.rivva.desearch.rivva.desocial.rivva.detumblr.rivva.dewww.rivva.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rivva.de | 7200 | 78.46.35.234 |
| NS | rivva.de | 7200 | ns.second-ns.com |
| NS | rivva.de | 7200 | ns1.your-server.de |
| NS | rivva.de | 7200 | ns3.second-ns.de |
| SOA | rivva.de | 7200 | ns1.your-server.de. postmaster.your-server.de. 2026103100 86400 1800 3600000 7200 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.