riiven.com
This relatively new domain has few observed referring domains and a low Domain Power Rank.
- Global Rank
- #39,670,931
▼ 1,152,511
- Rank in TLD
- #17,947,147
▼ 564,714
- Referring Domains
- 3
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.2
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 1 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 38.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 49.1
- Referring Domains
- 3
- Linked Domains
- 1,113
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 0
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 1
50–59 1
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 3
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| accio.com | 58.3 | #23,900 |
| globalwellnesssummit.com | 49.1 | #112,906 |
| unscroll.io | 7.3 | #59,141,352 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 30 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- Expires
- 30 Apr 2027 (176 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- NAMECHEAP INC
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | riiven.com | 1800 | 216.150.1.65 |
| A | riiven.com | 1800 | 216.150.16.1 |
| MX | riiven.com | 60 | 10 mx.zoho.com |
| MX | riiven.com | 60 | 20 mx2.zoho.com |
| MX | riiven.com | 60 | 30 mx3.zoho.com |
| NS | riiven.com | 86400 | ns1.vercel-dns.com |
| NS | riiven.com | 86400 | ns2.vercel-dns.com |
| SOA | riiven.com | 3600 | ns1.vercel-dns.com. hostmaster.nsone.net. 1753346548 43200 7200 1209600 600 |
| TXT | riiven.com | 60 | google-site-verification=8JIAmyvPSCJFvu-hz8hNMEMRixgNbje3o7PnhjNGJ6w |
| TXT | riiven.com | 60 | v=spf1 include:zohomail.com ~all |
| CAA | riiven.com | 60 | 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" |
| CAA | riiven.com | 60 | 0 issue "pki.goog" |
| CAA | riiven.com | 60 | 0 issue "sectigo.com" |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.