rigacomm.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 10 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #989,235
▲ 41,863
- Rank in TLD
- #407,286
▲ 19,587
- Referring Domains
- 100
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.0
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 14 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 33.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 32.8
- Referring Domains
- 100
- Linked Domains
- 168
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 5
10–19 21
20–29 20
30–39 13
40–49 29
50–59 9
60–69 2
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 100
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| nextcloud.com | 70.2 | #3,263 |
| lu.lv | 60.3 | #16,580 |
| onlyoffice.com | 60.2 | #16,984 |
| b2match.io | 58.8 | #21,821 |
| tradecommissioner.gc.ca | 58.0 | #25,083 |
| nic.lv | 55.8 | #36,406 |
| maksekeskus.ee | 53.8 | #51,183 |
| coinpedia.org | 53.2 | #56,754 |
| varam.gov.lv | 52.5 | #62,934 |
| hackerspaces.org | 51.4 | #75,798 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 28 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2025
- Expires
- 28 Feb 2027 (115 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- OK
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Ascio Technologies, Inc
Subdomain
ecom.rigacomm.comwww.rigacomm.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rigacomm.com | 14400 | 91.203.69.239 |
| MX | rigacomm.com | 14400 | 0 mail.rigacomm.com |
| NS | rigacomm.com | 86400 | ns.nano.lv |
| NS | rigacomm.com | 86400 | ns2.nano.lv |
| SOA | rigacomm.com | 86400 | ns.nano.lv. admin.nano.lv. 2026102600 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | rigacomm.com | 14400 | brevo-code:9326ba7d78ad7e5cb9fcc19fcc0d8b8c |
| TXT | rigacomm.com | 14400 | google-site-verification=cJN8t4RNIlkHbCc3ec-8nPSH5IJ95ZVv1E6KPHoSqm4 |
| TXT | rigacomm.com | 14400 | v=spf1 ip4:91.203.69.239 ip4:85.31.97.25 +a +mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.