richardt.name
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #354,678
▼ 20,701
- Rank in TLD
- #82
▲ 3
- Referring Domains
- 55
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 40.6
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 40.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 32.9
- Referring Domains
- 55
- Linked Domains
- 212
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 8
20–29 10
30–39 13
40–49 6
50–59 3
60–69 5
70–79 4
80–89 2
90–100 2
Total 55
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| stanford.edu | 83.3 | #237 |
| mit.edu | 83.2 | #238 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
| mpg.de | 74.3 | #1,459 |
| inria.fr | 72.9 | #1,964 |
| brown.edu | 72.7 | #2,030 |
| replicate.com | 66.4 | #6,059 |
| toronto.edu | 66.0 | #6,417 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .name
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Information Services, Inc.
- Registrar
- IONOS SE
Subdomain
expressive.richardt.nameexpressive2014.richardt.name
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | richardt.name | 3600 | 217.160.0.167 |
| MX | richardt.name | 3600 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | richardt.name | 3600 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | richardt.name | 3600 | 10 aspmx2.googlemail.com |
| MX | richardt.name | 3600 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | richardt.name | 172800 | ns1041.ui-dns.com |
| NS | richardt.name | 172800 | ns1041.ui-dns.de |
| NS | richardt.name | 172800 | ns1041.ui-dns.org |
| NS | richardt.name | 172800 | ns1041.ui-dns.biz |
| SOA | richardt.name | 86400 | ns1041.ui-dns.org. hostmaster.1and1.co.uk. 2017041320 28800 7200 604800 300 |
| TXT | richardt.name | 3600 | google-site-verification=F829TZkIQyGkT5mwhflpCd_unXauy-q1Kt1zJJosxss |
| TXT | richardt.name | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.