rh.sncf
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #116,747,583
▲ 1,039,812
- Rank in TLD
- #28
▲ 5
- Referring Domains
- 1
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.6
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 4 yr 3 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 15.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 15.6
- Referring Domains
- 1
- Linked Domains
- 0
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 1
20–29 0
30–39 0
40–49 0
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 1
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| qwenterprise.com | 15.6 | #18,328,440 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .sncf
- Registration date
- 22 Jul 2022
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2026
- Expires
- 22 Jul 2027 (259 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Société Nationale SNCF
- Registrar
- SafeBrands SAS
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rh.sncf | 33200 | 198.58.121.58 |
| MX | rh.sncf | 300 | 10 mxa-00363202.gslb.pphosted.com |
| MX | rh.sncf | 300 | 20 mxb-00363202.gslb.pphosted.com |
| NS | rh.sncf | 300 | ns1.safebrands.fr |
| NS | rh.sncf | 300 | ns2.safebrands.eu |
| NS | rh.sncf | 300 | ns3.safebrands.com |
| NS | rh.sncf | 300 | ns4.safebrands.org |
| NS | rh.sncf | 300 | ns5.safebrands.tech |
| SOA | rh.sncf | 300 | ns1.safebrands.fr. tech.brandshelter.com. 2025020400 28800 14400 3600000 300 |
| TXT | rh.sncf | 33200 | v=spf1 include:%{ir}.%{v}.%{d}.spf.has.pphosted.com -all |
| TXT | rh.sncf | 33200 | MS=ms77646420 |
| TXT | rh.sncf | 33200 | o4MtDKNQrOw1a/uZPrRcZBuS/3McgoGpsQ63mqUvbzN0CkC7o6bJv8O9pVGSnr7qB+nuA+pE68UwakVFsr+Xcg== |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Warning
The SPF check could not be completed because of too many DNS references or macros.
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.