revue-rita.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low.
- Global Rank
- #3,115,256
▲ 49,655
- Rank in TLD
- #1,306,498
▲ 6,106
- Referring Domains
- 68
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.2
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 18 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 39.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 33.6
- Referring Domains
- 68
- Linked Domains
- 569
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 9
20–29 15
30–39 9
40–49 8
50–59 12
60–69 9
70–79 3
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 68
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| asu.edu | 74.1 | #1,528 |
| over-blog.com | 72.3 | #2,199 |
| cnrs.fr | 71.9 | #2,383 |
| hal.science | 69.2 | #3,934 |
| openedition.org | 69.1 | #4,027 |
| hypotheses.org | 67.0 | #5,550 |
| unicamp.br | 66.1 | #6,279 |
| ulaval.ca | 65.6 | #6,815 |
| uc.pt | 63.7 | #9,220 |
| univ-lille.fr | 61.5 | #13,383 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 2 Sept 2008
- Last updated
- 3 Sept 2025
- Expires
- 2 Sept 2027 (301 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- OVH, SAS
Subdomain
www.revue-rita.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | revue-rita.com | 3600 | 217.160.0.109 |
| AAAA | revue-rita.com | 86400 | 2001:8d8:100f:f000::204 |
| MX | revue-rita.com | 3600 | 10 mx01.1and1.fr |
| MX | revue-rita.com | 3600 | 10 mx00.1and1.fr |
| NS | revue-rita.com | 172800 | ns62.1and1.fr |
| NS | revue-rita.com | 172800 | ns61.1and1.fr |
| SOA | revue-rita.com | 86400 | ns61.1and1.fr. hostmaster.1and1.fr. 2017071802 28800 7200 604800 300 |
| TXT | revue-rita.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf-eu.ionos.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.