rets.org.br
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #3,656,658
▲ 97,137
- Rank in TLD
- #31,431
▲ 1,195
- Referring Domains
- 43
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.6
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 31.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 26.6
- Referring Domains
- 43
- Linked Domains
- 1,124
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 12
20–29 8
30–39 8
40–49 4
50–59 6
60–69 2
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 43
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| eff.org | 77.1 | #834 |
| apc.org | 63.9 | #8,912 |
| globalvoices.org | 63.0 | #10,359 |
| jus.com.br | 56.6 | #31,922 |
| ifrn.edu.br | 54.9 | #42,372 |
| ip-watch.org | 52.4 | #64,860 |
| ifrs.edu.br | 51.8 | #70,811 |
| observatoriodaimprensa.com.br | 50.4 | #89,964 |
| uesb.br | 50.1 | #95,338 |
| politize.com.br | 48.6 | #123,383 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .brBrazil
- Domain statuses
- published
- Registry
- Comite Gestor da Internet no Brasil
Subdomain
d8.rets.org.brwww.rets.org.br
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rets.org.br | 300 | 201.46.64.35 |
| MX | rets.org.br | 1800 | 1 mx2.nupef.org.br |
| NS | rets.org.br | 3600 | paubrasil.ns.tiwa.net.br |
| NS | rets.org.br | 3600 | araucaria.ns.tiwa.net.br |
| NS | rets.org.br | 3600 | cedro.ns.tiwa.net.br |
| NS | rets.org.br | 3600 | nsx.ns.tiwa.net.br |
| NS | rets.org.br | 3600 | jequitiba.ns.tiwa.net.br |
| SOA | rets.org.br | 3600 | araucaria.ns.tiwa.net.br. hostmaster.rets.org.br. 2026102701 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | rets.org.br | 60 | dtm-domain-verification=tRwiPhBaFR_Pkah6RPNbRfhOyyBnC5DsgFtB5G1lMBY |
| TXT | rets.org.br | 60 | v=spf1 a mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=quarantine, asking receiving servers to quarantine messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.