repotama.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 10 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #449,167
▲ 1,599,219
- Rank in TLD
- #185,208
▲ 658,361
- Referring Domains
- 120
▲ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.4
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 15 yr 4 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.7
- Referring Domains
- 120
- Linked Domains
- 1,898
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 21
10–19 40
20–29 23
30–39 8
40–49 13
50–59 5
60–69 3
70–79 4
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 120
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| biglobe.ne.jp | 73.4 | #1,787 |
| blog.jp | 71.0 | #2,805 |
| lolipop.jp | 70.4 | #3,128 |
| impress.co.jp | 70.0 | #3,362 |
| nicovideo.jp | 69.7 | #3,586 |
| openedition.org | 69.1 | #4,027 |
| cocolog-nifty.com | 66.1 | #6,323 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 28 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2026
- Expires
- 28 Jun 2027 (235 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
No Observed Data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | repotama.com | 3600 | 183.181.91.142 |
| MX | repotama.com | 3600 | 10 repotama.com |
| NS | repotama.com | 3600 | ns3.wpx.ne.jp |
| NS | repotama.com | 3600 | ns2.wpx.ne.jp |
| NS | repotama.com | 3600 | ns1.wpx.ne.jp |
| SOA | repotama.com | 3600 | ns1.wpx.ne.jp. root.wpx.ne.jp. 0 10800 3600 604800 3600 |
| TXT | repotama.com | 3600 | v=spf1 +a:sv1141.wpx.ne.jp +a:repotama.com +mx include:_spf.google.com include:aspmx.googlemail.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.