render.capital
- Domain Power ranking within .capital: #62
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #1,108,373
▲ 1,039,532
- Rank in TLD
- #62
▲ 54
- Referring Domains
- 62
▲ 10
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.1
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- –
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 36.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 31.9
- Referring Domains
- 62
- Linked Domains
- 27
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 9
20–29 17
30–39 15
40–49 9
50–59 5
60–69 1
70–79 2
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 62
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| transistor.fm | 73.6 | #1,708 |
| ky.gov | 72.7 | #2,046 |
| louisville.edu | 62.9 | #10,476 |
| startupgrind.com | 57.5 | #27,439 |
| fi.co | 57.2 | #29,144 |
| dallasinnovates.com | 55.8 | #36,691 |
| nvca.org | 55.4 | #39,453 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .capital
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
www.render.capital
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | render.capital | 900 | 216.198.79.1 |
| MX | render.capital | 900 | 40 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | render.capital | 900 | 30 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | render.capital | 900 | 50 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | render.capital | 900 | 20 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | render.capital | 900 | 10 aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | render.capital | 900 | ns2.hover.com |
| NS | render.capital | 900 | ns1.hover.com |
| SOA | render.capital | 900 | ns1.hover.com. dnsmaster.hover.com. 1779383306 1800 900 604800 300 |
| TXT | render.capital | 900 | v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all |
| TXT | render.capital | 900 | google-site-verification=kd3wIE0ok913F9cNVrb987vpJcZHf0SCkcTOhgVCWHQ |
| TXT | render.capital | 900 | 1password-site-verification=VOZA4PA6LBBKBBFVF4JAOQARZI |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.