religiousstudiesproject.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #545,881
▼ 129,390
- Rank in TLD
- #224,101
▼ 53,618
- Referring Domains
- 246
▲ 20
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.0
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 15 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 31.9
- Referring Domains
- 246
- Linked Domains
- 2,342
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 20
10–19 45
20–29 54
30–39 33
40–49 17
50–59 23
60–69 34
70–79 14
80–89 4
90–100 2
Total 246
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| stanford.edu | 83.3 | #237 |
| oup.com | 80.9 | #401 |
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| ox.ac.uk | 78.9 | #601 |
| wisc.edu | 77.3 | #812 |
| cam.ac.uk | 76.9 | #871 |
| umn.edu | 76.7 | #913 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 29 Sept 2011
- Last updated
- 28 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 29 Sept 2027 (329 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- TUCOWS.COM, CO.
Subdomain
webmail.religiousstudiesproject.comwww.religiousstudiesproject.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | religiousstudiesproject.com | 60 | 173.236.236.224 |
| MX | religiousstudiesproject.com | 60 | 0 mx1.mailchannels.net |
| MX | religiousstudiesproject.com | 60 | 0 mx2.mailchannels.net |
| NS | religiousstudiesproject.com | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| NS | religiousstudiesproject.com | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| NS | religiousstudiesproject.com | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | religiousstudiesproject.com | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026100103 18652 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | religiousstudiesproject.com | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.