rcptm.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,471,973
▲ 263,716
- Rank in TLD
- #612,679
▲ 102,376
- Referring Domains
- 184
▲ 14
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.8
- Subdomains
- 4
- Domain age
- 16 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.8
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 16.8
- Referring Domains
- 184
- Linked Domains
- 321
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 101
20–29 37
30–39 18
40–49 12
50–59 9
60–69 5
70–79 1
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 184
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| mdpi.com | 80.3 | #459 |
| tum.de | 71.0 | #2,818 |
| cuni.cz | 67.5 | #5,132 |
| muni.cz | 66.4 | #6,057 |
| mzv.gov.cz | 60.7 | #15,511 |
| amu.edu.pl | 60.1 | #17,275 |
| univ-nantes.fr | 60.0 | #17,489 |
| upol.cz | 59.3 | #19,958 |
| vsb.cz | 57.0 | #29,902 |
| unime.it | 55.6 | #37,635 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 30 Sept 2010
- Last updated
- 25 Sept 2026
- Expires
- 30 Sept 2028 (695 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Gransy, s.r.o.
Subdomain
conference.rcptm.comcovid.rcptm.comprojects.rcptm.comwww.rcptm.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rcptm.com | 300 | 185.8.237.6 |
| A | rcptm.com | 300 | 185.8.237.5 |
| MX | rcptm.com | 1800 | 1 wes1-mx1.wedos.net |
| MX | rcptm.com | 1800 | 1 wes1-mx2.wedos.net |
| MX | rcptm.com | 1800 | 10 wes1-mx-backup.wedos.net |
| NS | rcptm.com | 3600 | ns.wedos.com |
| NS | rcptm.com | 3600 | ns.wedos.net |
| NS | rcptm.com | 3600 | ns.wedos.cz |
| NS | rcptm.com | 3600 | ns.wedos.eu |
| SOA | rcptm.com | 3600 | ns.wedos.net. wedos.wedos.com. 2026092502 3600 1800 1814400 3600 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.