rcmdnk.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,049,074
▲ 284,166
- Rank in TLD
- #432,303
▲ 120,884
- Referring Domains
- 60
▼ 5
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- 9 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 25.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.0
- Referring Domains
- 60
- Linked Domains
- 938
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 10
10–19 21
20–29 12
30–39 9
40–49 1
50–59 2
60–69 3
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 60
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| hatena.ne.jp | 82.7 | #270 |
| qiita.com | 69.3 | #3,869 |
| zenn.dev | 65.4 | #7,013 |
| classmethod.jp | 61.8 | #12,663 |
| no-ip.com | 58.6 | #22,547 |
| asablo.jp | 50.1 | #94,417 |
| tvbok.com | 42.6 | #326,647 |
| site-builder.wiki | 39.3 | #530,301 |
| bugbugnow.net | 39.0 | #555,707 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 25 Dec 2016
- Last updated
- 24 Dec 2022
- Expires
- 25 Dec 2031 (1,876 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GMO Internet Group, Inc. d/b/a Onamae.com
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rcmdnk.com | 300 | 172.67.193.102 |
| A | rcmdnk.com | 300 | 104.21.57.227 |
| AAAA | rcmdnk.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3030::ac43:c166 |
| AAAA | rcmdnk.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3031::6815:39e3 |
| NS | rcmdnk.com | 86400 | austin.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | rcmdnk.com | 86400 | brenda.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | rcmdnk.com | 1800 | austin.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418257146 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.