randform.org
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #7,222,194
▼ 2,326,779
- Rank in TLD
- #547,081
▼ 151,182
- Referring Domains
- 15
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.7
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 20 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 37.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 31.7
- Referring Domains
- 15
- Linked Domains
- 1,493
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 3
20–29 1
30–39 4
40–49 2
50–59 1
60–69 2
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 15
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ucsc.edu | 70.3 | #3,194 |
| wikidot.com | 67.7 | #4,943 |
| netzpolitik.org | 66.1 | #6,384 |
| ffii.org | 59.2 | #20,162 |
| spreeblick.com | 49.4 | #106,140 |
| cameronneylon.net | 45.6 | #201,385 |
| mediateletipos.net | 39.9 | #489,433 |
| riesenmaschine.de | 31.7 | #1,698,038 |
| atlas-of-the-underworld.org | 31.0 | #1,882,673 |
| lilligreen.de | 31.0 | #1,878,941 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 16 May 2006
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 16 May 2027 (192 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Cronon GmbH
Subdomain
www.randform.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | randform.org | 150 | 81.169.145.162 |
| AAAA | randform.org | 150 | 2a01:238:20a:202:1162:: |
| MX | randform.org | 150 | 5 smtpin.rzone.de |
| NS | randform.org | 150 | docks18.rzone.de |
| NS | randform.org | 150 | shades02.rzone.de |
| SOA | randform.org | 150 | shades02.rzone.de. hostmaster.strato-rz.de. 2020053017 86400 7200 604800 300 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.