rakcha.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #13,599,361
▼ 912,538
- Rank in TLD
- #5,873,855
▼ 417,634
- Referring Domains
- 17
–
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.1
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 21 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 19.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 17.4
- Referring Domains
- 17
- Linked Domains
- 774
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 6
10–19 5
20–29 3
30–39 1
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 17
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| albinoblacksheep.com | 49.1 | #111,441 |
| shakin.ru | 43.8 | #271,263 |
| limecube.co | 38.7 | #581,393 |
| danielandrade.net | 27.1 | #3,516,812 |
| netsmarter.com | 24.3 | #5,265,025 |
| petratungarden.se | 22.2 | #6,985,642 |
| getseoinfo.com | 18.4 | #12,541,592 |
| regieprivee.ch | 18.0 | #13,354,147 |
| sysshop.ir | 17.4 | #14,409,526 |
| graburdeals.com | 13.4 | #24,819,057 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 27 Sept 2005
- Last updated
- 30 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 27 Sept 2027 (326 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- DomainSite, Inc.
Subdomain
blog.rakcha.comwww.rakcha.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rakcha.com | 14400 | 198.252.98.100 |
| MX | rakcha.com | 352 | 0 rakcha.com |
| NS | rakcha.com | 86400 | ns2.hawkhost.com |
| NS | rakcha.com | 86400 | ns1.hawkhost.com |
| SOA | rakcha.com | 86400 | ns1.hawkhost.com. server.hawkhost.com. 2026110201 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | rakcha.com | 10750 | v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:198.252.98.13 include:_spf.arandomserver.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.