rah.ru
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #202,702
▲ 3,791
- Rank in TLD
- #2,984
▲ 198
- Referring Domains
- 574
－
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.9
- Subdomains
- 9
- Domain age
- 23 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.5
- Referring Domains
- 574
- Linked Domains
- 952
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 74
10–19 131
20–29 152
30–39 94
40–49 57
50–59 36
60–69 22
70–79 5
80–89 1
90–100 2
Total 574
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| t.me | 90.0 | #50 |
| tilda.ws | 82.3 | #295 |
| livejournal.com | 75.9 | #1,065 |
| narod.ru | 71.8 | #2,456 |
| wikidata.org | 71.6 | #2,513 |
| timepad.ru | 71.0 | #2,789 |
| kommersant.ru | 70.4 | #3,124 |
| ria.ru | 69.9 | #3,457 |
| rg.ru | 69.7 | #3,584 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .ruRussia
- Registration date
- 13 Feb 2003
- Expires
- 14 Feb 2027 (102 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- REGISTERED DELEGATED VERIFIED
- Registry
- Coordination Center for TLD RU
- Registrar
- RU-CENTER-RU
Subdomain
academia.rah.rucn.rah.ruen.rah.ruwww.en.rah.rueng.rah.ruwww.eng.rah.runew.rah.ruwww.new.rah.ruwww.rah.ru
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | rah.ru | 10800 | 217.107.219.53 |
| MX | rah.ru | 10800 | 5 mail.rah.ru |
| NS | rah.ru | 10800 | ns2.jino.ru |
| NS | rah.ru | 10800 | ns3.jino.ru |
| NS | rah.ru | 10800 | ns1.jino.ru |
| NS | rah.ru | 10800 | ns4.jino.ru |
| SOA | rah.ru | 86400 | ns1.jino.ru. hostmaster@jino.ru. 2013042601 16384 2048 1048576 25600 |
| TXT | rah.ru | 10800 | proculture-verification: 7463973474891d8bca6f710fe69e3e37 |
| TXT | rah.ru | 10800 | v=spf1 redirect=_spf.jino.ru |
| CAA | rah.ru | 10800 | 0 issue "letsencrypt.org" |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.