Skip to content

ragnet.co.jp

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
43.2
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#296,492

▲ 261,992

Rank in TLD
#8,225

▲ 7,206

Referring Domains
415

▲ 3

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
21.0
Subdomains
22
Domain age
26 yr 4 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
wikipedia.org91.8#34
hatena.ne.jp82.7#270
ameblo.jp80.3#460
fc2.com77.6#755
livedoor.jp72.6#2,091
complex.com70.6#3,004
itmedia.co.jp69.5#3,689
cocolog-nifty.com66.1#6,323
livepocket.jp63.8#8,961
tower.jp63.7#9,138

Basic Information

Registration date
20 Jun 2000
Last updated
11 Sept 2026
Expires
30 Jun 2027 (237 days remaining)

Subdomain

athletic.ragnet.co.jpbirthday.ragnet.co.jpcare.ragnet.co.jpcheer.ragnet.co.jpemotion.ragnet.co.jpfes.ragnet.co.jpfolk.ragnet.co.jpkaraoke.ragnet.co.jpkorea.ragnet.co.jplove-song.ragnet.co.jpmedia.ragnet.co.jpmusic.ragnet.co.jporigin.ragnet.co.jppsychology.ragnet.co.jpremarks.ragnet.co.jpsideshow.ragnet.co.jpstatic.ragnet.co.jpsurprise.ragnet.co.jpvm.ragnet.co.jpworld.ragnet.co.jp

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aragnet.co.jp300172.67.219.218
Aragnet.co.jp300104.21.35.118
AAAAragnet.co.jp3002606:4700:3037::ac43:dbda
AAAAragnet.co.jp3002606:4700:3036::6815:2376
MXragnet.co.jp3001 aspmx.l.google.com
MXragnet.co.jp30010 aspmx2.googlemail.com
MXragnet.co.jp30010 aspmx3.googlemail.com
MXragnet.co.jp3005 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
MXragnet.co.jp3005 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
NSragnet.co.jp86400clark.ns.cloudflare.com
NSragnet.co.jp86400wally.ns.cloudflare.com
SOAragnet.co.jp1800clark.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2419185170 10000 2400 604800 1800
TXTragnet.co.jp300v=spf1 ip4:219.117.249.224/29 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.