radioelvas.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #2,127,744
▲ 188,417
- Rank in TLD
- #893,486
▲ 62,269
- Referring Domains
- 102
▲ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 25 yr 7 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.9
- Referring Domains
- 102
- Linked Domains
- 316
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 9
10–19 23
20–29 30
30–39 21
40–49 9
50–59 4
60–69 4
70–79 0
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 102
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| linktr.ee | 84.7 | #161 |
| sapo.pt | 69.0 | #4,054 |
| up.pt | 65.1 | #7,353 |
| webnode.page | 63.9 | #8,882 |
| unl.pt | 63.6 | #9,301 |
| uevora.pt | 57.3 | #28,360 |
| ulusofona.pt | 54.6 | #44,584 |
| cienciaviva.pt | 51.7 | #72,675 |
| ipportalegre.pt | 51.3 | #77,061 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 8 Mar 2001
- Last updated
- 2 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 8 Mar 2027 (124 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Network Solutions, LLC
Subdomain
www.radioelvas.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | radioelvas.com | 500 | 188.93.234.20 |
| MX | radioelvas.com | 500 | 10 mx1.cleanmx.pt |
| MX | radioelvas.com | 500 | 20 mx2.cleanmx.pt |
| NS | radioelvas.com | 500 | ns1.radioelvas.com |
| NS | radioelvas.com | 500 | ns2.radioelvas.com |
| SOA | radioelvas.com | 500 | ns1.radioelvas.com. afgois.gmail.com. 2026110407 3600 1800 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | radioelvas.com | 500 | google-site-verification=cYg9bTXyusI3-aHuz_4eeR6eHpvkAg_gynzoPvZI40s |
| TXT | radioelvas.com | 500 | v=spf1 ip4:188.93.234.20 +a +mx +ip4:94.46.15.240 +include:_spf.cleanmx.pt ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.