radikal.host
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #234,470
▲ 35,318
- Rank in TLD
- #29
－
- Referring Domains
- 1,090
▲ 11
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.7
- Subdomains
- 7
- Domain age
- 4 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 20.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 18.8
- Referring Domains
- 1,090
- Linked Domains
- 16
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 211
10–19 392
20–29 283
30–39 110
40–49 52
50–59 28
60–69 9
70–79 5
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 1,090
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| liveinternet.ru | 77.1 | #840 |
| livejournal.com | 75.9 | #1,065 |
| kaspersky.com | 74.0 | #1,539 |
| neocities.org | 71.5 | #2,561 |
| timepad.ru | 71.0 | #2,789 |
| ucoz.ru | 68.5 | #4,433 |
| xrea.com | 65.7 | #6,740 |
| bitcointalk.org | 64.7 | #7,861 |
| klavogonki.ru | 62.6 | #11,105 |
| tw1.ru | 61.4 | #13,534 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .host
- Registration date
- 22 Feb 2022
- Last updated
- 7 Feb 2026
- Expires
- 22 Feb 2027 (109 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Radix Technologies Inc.
- Registrar
- Registrar of Domain Names REG.RU LLC
Subdomain
a.radikal.hostb.radikal.hostd.radikal.hoste.radikal.hostf.radikal.hostg.radikal.hostwww.radikal.host
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | radikal.host | 300 | 95.78.127.236 |
| MX | radikal.host | 300 | 10 emx.mail.ru |
| NS | radikal.host | 86400 | deb.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | radikal.host | 86400 | lloyd.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | radikal.host | 1800 | deb.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2419303207 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | radikal.host | 300 | google-site-verification=0nVkfOaV7FJIMQGLMCZwEpOSsk8Kkky0GCVHTc3WcRg |
| TXT | radikal.host | 300 | v=spf1 redirect=_spf.mail.ru |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.