qppstudio.net
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #257,964
▼ 46,734
- Rank in TLD
- #8,480
▼ 1,625
- Referring Domains
- 170
▼ 11
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.3
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 24 yr 8 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.3
- Referring Domains
- 170
- Linked Domains
- 152
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 20
10–19 59
20–29 34
30–39 17
40–49 16
50–59 11
60–69 6
70–79 5
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 170
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| iana.org | 83.1 | #250 |
| cmu.edu | 79.4 | #555 |
| umn.edu | 76.7 | #913 |
| basecamp.com | 74.6 | #1,391 |
| uw.edu | 73.4 | #1,780 |
| edweek.org | 72.6 | #2,072 |
| royalmail.com | 69.8 | #3,482 |
| hrdive.com | 68.3 | #4,549 |
| 8x8.com | 64.7 | #7,810 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .net
- Registration date
- 15 Feb 2002
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2020
- Expires
- 15 Feb 2030 (1,198 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- NetEarth One Inc. d/b/a NetEarth
Subdomain
www.qppstudio.net
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | qppstudio.net | 14400 | 162.217.146.198 |
| AAAA | qppstudio.net | 14400 | 2604:d680:5::21 |
| MX | qppstudio.net | 14400 | 0 qppstudio.net |
| NS | qppstudio.net | 86400 | ns1.webline-dns.com |
| NS | qppstudio.net | 86400 | ns2.webline-dns.com |
| SOA | qppstudio.net | 86400 | ns1.webline-dns.com. administrator.webline-services.com. 2025010901 3600 7200 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | qppstudio.net | 14400 | v=spf1 a mx a:qppstudio.net ip4:162.217.146.198 ip6:2604:d680:5::21 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.