prowizard.store
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #12,210,573
▲ 286,527
- Rank in TLD
- #7,883
▼ 339
- Referring Domains
- 15
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.6
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 8 yr 2 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.6
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 19.3
- Referring Domains
- 15
- Linked Domains
- 28
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 7
20–29 3
30–39 2
40–49 0
50–59 1
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 15
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ya.ru | 69.5 | #3,725 |
| sibnet.ru | 50.8 | #84,951 |
| restoranoved.ru | 39.1 | #550,736 |
| pos-center.ru | 30.8 | #1,935,705 |
| foodonaut.ru | 28.6 | #2,790,925 |
| wizard-c.ru | 25.5 | #4,422,100 |
| optposcenter.ru | 23.2 | #6,118,935 |
| slamitver.ru | 19.3 | #10,863,334 |
| gravitsky.ru | 17.6 | #13,985,450 |
| buffett.ru | 15.6 | #18,413,424 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .store
- Registration date
- 29 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2025
- Expires
- 29 Aug 2027 (297 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- Radix Technologies Inc.
- Registrar
- Regional Network Information Center, JSC dba RU-CENTER
Subdomain
tver.prowizard.store
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | prowizard.store | 3600 | 31.31.198.247 |
| AAAA | prowizard.store | 3600 | 2a00:f940:2:2:1:3:0:176 |
| MX | prowizard.store | 21600 | 10 mx.yandex.net |
| NS | prowizard.store | 3600 | ns1.hosting.reg.ru |
| NS | prowizard.store | 3600 | ns2.hosting.reg.ru |
| SOA | prowizard.store | 3600 | vip176.hosting.reg.ru. support.reg.ru. 2025032372 10800 3600 604800 86400 |
| TXT | prowizard.store | 3600 | mx.yandex.net |
| TXT | prowizard.store | 3600 | v=spf1 redirect=_spf.yandex.net |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.