Skip to content

provisors.com

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
37.0
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#725,545

▲ 104,889

Rank in TLD
#297,764

▲ 41,861

Referring Domains
204

▲ 25

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
20.5
Subdomains
3
Domain age
25 yr 2 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
constantcontact.com80.6#429
libsyn.com78.5#653
ucdavis.edu74.8#1,331
wildapricot.org74.0#1,551
natlawreview.com68.1#4,701
rb.ru59.8#17,976
labusinessjournal.com58.7#22,294
impactmybiz.com51.1#79,830
aleragroup.com50.7#85,912
schoolofmotion.com50.5#87,943

Basic Information

TLD
.com
Registration date
28 Aug 2001
Last updated
28 Jun 2022
Expires
28 Aug 2027 (297 days remaining)
Registrar
Network Solutions, LLC

Subdomain

hub.provisors.commember.provisors.comwww.provisors.com

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aprovisors.com1800151.101.194.159
MXprovisors.com180010 d239567b.ess.barracudanetworks.com
MXprovisors.com18000 d239567a.ess.barracudanetworks.com
NSprovisors.com86400ns3.dnsmadeeasy.com
NSprovisors.com86400ns1.dnsmadeeasy.com
NSprovisors.com86400ns4.dnsmadeeasy.com
NSprovisors.com86400ns0.dnsmadeeasy.com
NSprovisors.com86400ns2.dnsmadeeasy.com
SOAprovisors.com86400ns0.dnsmadeeasy.com. dns.dnsmadeeasy.com. 2008010380 43200 3600 1209600 180
TXTprovisors.com1800v=spf1 include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com include:email.nimbleams.com include:spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com -all
TXTprovisors.com1800MS=54CBBE82EC31DCD3D286FD15A984818D13ABAE09
TXTprovisors.com18008306890.spf08.hubspotemail.net
TXTprovisors.com1800provisorswp.azurewebsites.net
TXTprovisors.com1800MS=ms19985666

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Valid

DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.