prophy.science
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #477,556
▼ 115,171
- Rank in TLD
- #52
▼ 13
- Referring Domains
- 17
▲ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 49.9
- Subdomains
- 2
- Domain age
- 10 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 49.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 52.5
- Referring Domains
- 17
- Linked Domains
- 1
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 0
20–29 3
30–39 4
40–49 1
50–59 5
60–69 1
70–79 2
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 17
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikidata.org | 71.6 | #2,513 |
| epfl.ch | 71.5 | #2,562 |
| karger.com | 66.8 | #5,697 |
| tuwien.at | 59.3 | #19,839 |
| stm-assoc.org | 55.8 | #36,676 |
| council.science | 55.7 | #37,272 |
| highwirepress.com | 54.6 | #45,044 |
| digital-science.com | 52.5 | #62,873 |
| peerreviewweek.net | 44.9 | #226,423 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .science
- Registration date
- 21 Sept 2016
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2026
- Expires
- 20 Sept 2030 (1,415 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- dot Science Limited
- Registrar
- Gandi SAS
Subdomain
www.blog.prophy.sciencewww.prophy.science
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | prophy.science | 10800 | 142.132.242.164 |
| MX | prophy.science | 300 | 10 smtp.google.com |
| NS | prophy.science | 86400 | harleigh.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | prophy.science | 86400 | matteo.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | prophy.science | 1800 | harleigh.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2418556071 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | prophy.science | 1800 | google-site-verification=dXTdM-oDPnJYhv-81XfbZUMSVyNuM9jZHpw0oYvC4vU |
| TXT | prophy.science | 1800 | google-site-verification=rW7k4xhaTjii8Ab-7OHOYSJw5nrWEyGDmSwOzkkr7WA |
| TXT | prophy.science | 1800 | v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:spf.mtasv.net include:_spf.createsend.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Warning
DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.