promar.org
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively low.
- Global Rank
- #9,439,272
▼ 1,455,568
- Rank in TLD
- #687,203
▼ 94,528
- Referring Domains
- 13
▼ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.5
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 5 yr 5 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 24.5
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.6
- Referring Domains
- 13
- Linked Domains
- 43
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 1
10–19 4
20–29 5
30–39 1
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 0
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 13
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| adelphi.de | 49.7 | #101,057 |
| zwia.org | 46.1 | #187,579 |
| codexverde.cl | 32.2 | #1,578,750 |
| greenfundsuriname.org | 29.0 | #2,620,455 |
| cfbc.edu.kn | 25.7 | #4,289,590 |
| cegesti.org | 24.4 | #5,212,760 |
| remarco.org | 21.6 | #7,547,087 |
| toumali.org | 20.7 | #8,665,771 |
| municlimon.go.cr | 17.4 | #14,340,045 |
| elbrifin.com | 16.1 | #17,142,197 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 11 May 2021
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 11 May 2027 (187 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- Mesh Digital Limited
Subdomain
www.promar.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | promar.org | 3600 | 49.13.114.205 |
| MX | promar.org | 3600 | 100 mxlb.ispgateway.de |
| MX | promar.org | 3600 | 10 mail.adelphi.de |
| NS | promar.org | 3600 | ns11.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | promar.org | 3600 | ns12.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | promar.org | 3600 | ns11.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026031301 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | promar.org | 3600 | v=spf1 mx a include:spf.adelphi.de ~all |
| TXT | promar.org | 3600 | MS=ms76230509 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.