profiteditorial.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #419,737
▼ 6,294
- Rank in TLD
- #173,623
▼ 4,281
- Referring Domains
- 220
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.4
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 18 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 26.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.1
- Referring Domains
- 220
- Linked Domains
- 172
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 30
10–19 56
20–29 60
30–39 33
40–49 21
50–59 10
60–69 6
70–79 3
80–89 1
90–100 0
Total 220
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| google.es | 78.8 | #606 |
| elpais.com | 76.0 | #1,043 |
| google.com.mx | 71.2 | #2,693 |
| iese.edu | 67.4 | #5,238 |
| google.com.pe | 66.4 | #6,052 |
| google.com.ec | 66.4 | #6,066 |
| upf.edu | 65.2 | #7,283 |
| upc.edu | 64.9 | #7,614 |
| ua.es | 64.3 | #8,409 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 22 Nov 2007
- Last updated
- 13 Jun 2025
- Expires
- 22 Nov 2026 (17 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Arsys Internet, S.L. dba NICLINE.COM
Subdomain
www.profiteditorial.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | profiteditorial.com | 300 | 194.164.162.71 |
| MX | profiteditorial.com | 300 | 1 smtp.google.com |
| NS | profiteditorial.com | 86400 | colette.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | profiteditorial.com | 86400 | yahir.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | profiteditorial.com | 1800 | colette.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2415952492 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
| TXT | profiteditorial.com | 300 | google-site-verification=PG4MbbTg3cnC6-7qBTjrc-KkmYLbwD_FkaJ8UppLdKg |
| TXT | profiteditorial.com | 300 | google-site-verification=PfwwnTnpAPweSnhO0yozrxvw8FqtwiJKs8Mbv4uR7o8 |
| TXT | profiteditorial.com | 300 | v=spf1 a include:_spf.google.com include:_spf.mailspamprotection.com ip4:194.164.162.71 -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.