proandre.com
This domain has been registered for many years, but its Domain Power Rank is low. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #11,818,653
▼ 839,643
- Rank in TLD
- #5,101,678
▼ 402,335
- Referring Domains
- 12
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.2
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 23 yr 0 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 29.5
- Referring Domains
- 12
- Linked Domains
- 19
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 2
10–19 2
20–29 2
30–39 3
40–49 2
50–59 0
60–69 1
70–79 0
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 12
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| eleconomista.es | 66.3 | #6,147 |
| stanpa.com | 46.9 | #164,039 |
| europeancleaningjournal.com | 41.3 | #397,276 |
| profesionalhoreca.com | 39.6 | #508,080 |
| europropre.com | 34.0 | #1,176,128 |
| arvet.es | 30.6 | #2,012,847 |
| asfel.com | 28.3 | #2,925,754 |
| aseban.com | 21.3 | #7,973,217 |
| feban.es | 16.9 | #15,449,809 |
| asfelblog.es | 16.1 | #17,122,567 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 10 Oct 2003
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2026
- Expires
- 10 Oct 2027 (339 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited autoRenewPeriod
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- IONOS SE
Subdomain
www.proandre.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | proandre.com | 3600 | 217.76.130.105 |
| MX | proandre.com | 3600 | 10 mx.serviciodecorreo.es |
| NS | proandre.com | 3600 | dns1.infopime.com |
| NS | proandre.com | 3600 | dns2.infopime.com |
| SOA | proandre.com | 3600 | dns1.infopime.com. hostmaster.infopime.com. 2022110769 21600 3600 2419200 60 |
| TXT | proandre.com | 3600 | v=spf1 include:_spf.serviciodecorreo.es include:eu.zcsend.net ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.