predictors.fail
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #2,087,671
▲ 14,035
- Rank in TLD
- #29
－
- Referring Domains
- 67
▼ 8
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.4
- Subdomains
- 0
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 41.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 45.2
- Referring Domains
- 67
- Linked Domains
- 51
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 9
20–29 10
30–39 6
40–49 14
50–59 14
60–69 3
70–79 8
80–89 0
90–100 0
Total 67
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| ycombinator.com | 78.0 | #705 |
| techradar.com | 76.6 | #936 |
| kaspersky.com | 74.0 | #1,539 |
| digitaltrends.com | 72.5 | #2,132 |
| infoq.com | 72.2 | #2,245 |
| thehackernews.com | 72.1 | #2,304 |
| tomshardware.com | 70.8 | #2,909 |
| macrumors.com | 70.8 | #2,930 |
| sapo.pt | 69.0 | #4,054 |
| gigazine.net | 60.7 | #15,282 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .fail
No registration data could be retrieved.
Subdomain
No data
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | predictors.fail | 1799 | 185.199.108.153 |
| A | predictors.fail | 1799 | 185.199.111.153 |
| A | predictors.fail | 1799 | 185.199.109.153 |
| A | predictors.fail | 1799 | 185.199.110.153 |
| MX | predictors.fail | 1800 | 10 eforward1.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | predictors.fail | 1800 | 10 eforward2.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | predictors.fail | 1800 | 10 eforward3.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | predictors.fail | 1800 | 15 eforward4.registrar-servers.com |
| MX | predictors.fail | 1800 | 20 eforward5.registrar-servers.com |
| NS | predictors.fail | 1800 | dns1.registrar-servers.com |
| NS | predictors.fail | 1800 | dns2.registrar-servers.com |
| SOA | predictors.fail | 359 | dns1.registrar-servers.com. hostmaster.registrar-servers.com. 1738007055 43200 3600 604800 3601 |
| TXT | predictors.fail | 1800 | v=spf1 include:spf.efwd.registrar-servers.com ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.