prayercast.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #377,567
▲ 14,516
- Rank in TLD
- #156,648
▲ 4,305
- Referring Domains
- 310
▲ 3
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.2
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 22 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.2
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 21.0
- Referring Domains
- 310
- Linked Domains
- 656
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 44
10–19 96
20–29 97
30–39 48
40–49 10
50–59 8
60–69 2
70–79 2
80–89 3
90–100 0
Total 310
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| bit.ly | 88.4 | #67 |
| weebly.com | 87.4 | #85 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| buzzsprout.com | 78.4 | #662 |
| ning.com | 72.1 | #2,291 |
| joinhandshake.com | 65.9 | #6,474 |
| salsalabs.org | 63.2 | #9,973 |
| cru.org | 59.3 | #19,910 |
| regent.edu | 56.4 | #33,220 |
| joshuaproject.net | 56.3 | #33,781 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 25 Dec 2003
- Last updated
- 26 Dec 2025
- Expires
- 25 Dec 2026 (50 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
assets.prayercast.commail.prayercast.comwww.prayercast.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | prayercast.com | 60 | 141.193.213.10 |
| MX | prayercast.com | 60 | 0 prayercast.com |
| NS | prayercast.com | 60 | ns01.owm.org |
| NS | prayercast.com | 60 | ns02.owm.org |
| SOA | prayercast.com | 60 | web.owm.org. webmaster.owm.org. 2026091502 3600 7200 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | prayercast.com | 60 | google-site-verification=f1Y0_Xd4bhlUYQp1PXPiRw2OyRQ0NXDyzdOOhKSzbAc |
| TXT | prayercast.com | 60 | v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:23.254.238.90 ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.