pluscad.jp
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #552,787
▲ 45,675
- Rank in TLD
- #14,889
▲ 1,507
- Referring Domains
- 67
▲ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.7
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 19 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 23.7
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 16.3
- Referring Domains
- 67
- Linked Domains
- 180
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 8
10–19 30
20–29 11
30–39 5
40–49 6
50–59 4
60–69 1
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 67
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| prtimes.jp | 77.1 | #841 |
| forbesjapan.com | 63.3 | #9,752 |
| daikin.co.jp | 57.7 | #26,477 |
| en-japan.com | 56.6 | #32,159 |
| rakus.co.jp | 52.2 | #66,785 |
| aspicjapan.org | 51.3 | #77,799 |
| buffaloes.co.jp | 49.4 | #107,008 |
| zuuonline.com | 49.1 | #112,167 |
| digi-mado.jp | 44.1 | #256,614 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .jpJapan
- Registration date
- 5 Dec 2006
- Last updated
- 1 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 31 Dec 2026 (56 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- Active
- Registry
- Japan Registry Services Co., Ltd.
Subdomain
25th.pluscad.jpweb.pluscad.jpwww.pluscad.jp
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | pluscad.jp | 3600 | 164.46.38.187 |
| MX | pluscad.jp | 3600 | 100 pluscad.jp |
| NS | pluscad.jp | 172800 | ns-1345.awsdns-40.org |
| NS | pluscad.jp | 172800 | ns-1608.awsdns-09.co.uk |
| NS | pluscad.jp | 172800 | ns-297.awsdns-37.com |
| NS | pluscad.jp | 172800 | ns-521.awsdns-01.net |
| SOA | pluscad.jp | 900 | ns-521.awsdns-01.net. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | pluscad.jp | 3600 | v=spf1 ip4:164.46.38.187 ip4:13.113.248.80 ip4:13.114.11.36 ip4:52.69.167.24 ip4:54.65.148.127 ip4:54.95.24.108 ip4:54.95.63.52 mx ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.