pixelqi.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,160,601
▼ 24,729
- Rank in TLD
- #479,433
▼ 7,983
- Referring Domains
- 241
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.1
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 18 yr 10 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 30.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 23.8
- Referring Domains
- 241
- Linked Domains
- 565
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 24
10–19 64
20–29 56
30–39 31
40–49 27
50–59 14
60–69 18
70–79 5
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 241
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| googleblog.com | 80.8 | #413 |
| ycombinator.com | 78.0 | #705 |
| techradar.com | 76.6 | #936 |
| networkworld.com | 71.2 | #2,731 |
| tomshardware.com | 70.8 | #2,909 |
| macrumors.com | 70.8 | #2,930 |
| ibiblio.org | 69.9 | #3,456 |
| openlibrary.org | 69.2 | #3,904 |
| sapo.pt | 69.0 | #4,054 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 2 Jan 2008
- Last updated
- 2 Jan 2026
- Expires
- 2 Jan 2027 (58 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Gname.com Pte. Ltd.
Subdomain
www.pixelqi.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | pixelqi.com | 300 | 104.21.12.225 |
| A | pixelqi.com | 300 | 172.67.196.130 |
| AAAA | pixelqi.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3033::6815:ce1 |
| AAAA | pixelqi.com | 300 | 2606:4700:3034::ac43:c482 |
| NS | pixelqi.com | 86400 | karsyn.ns.cloudflare.com |
| NS | pixelqi.com | 86400 | kyree.ns.cloudflare.com |
| SOA | pixelqi.com | 1800 | karsyn.ns.cloudflare.com. dns.cloudflare.com. 2416383725 10000 2400 604800 1800 |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Warning
No MX record was found, but mail delivery may fall back to this domain’s A or AAAA record.
- SPF
- Not configured
No matching DNS record was found.
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.