pinstand.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. This domain has few referring domains.
- Global Rank
- #635,453
▲ 440,199
- Rank in TLD
- #260,546
▲ 185,916
- Referring Domains
- 24
▼ 2
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 46.0
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 27 yr 1 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 46.0
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 38.1
- Referring Domains
- 24
- Linked Domains
- 489
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 0
10–19 4
20–29 4
30–39 5
40–49 1
50–59 1
60–69 5
70–79 0
80–89 3
90–100 1
Total 24
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| w3.org | 88.8 | #62 |
| wikimedia.org | 85.2 | #150 |
| icann.org | 81.8 | #323 |
| ibiblio.org | 69.9 | #3,456 |
| polito.it | 64.3 | #8,367 |
| fontsinuse.com | 62.0 | #12,308 |
| nanog.org | 61.7 | #12,859 |
| isoc.org | 61.0 | #14,689 |
| aoir.org | 51.2 | #78,939 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 21 Sept 1999
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 21 Sept 2027 (320 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- DREAMHOST
Subdomain
www.pinstand.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | pinstand.com | 60 | 173.236.242.120 |
| MX | pinstand.com | 60 | 0 mx1.dreamhost.com |
| MX | pinstand.com | 60 | 0 mx2.dreamhost.com |
| NS | pinstand.com | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| NS | pinstand.com | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| NS | pinstand.com | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | pinstand.com | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026101103 21573 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | pinstand.com | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.