pierrejoris.com
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #1,826,771
▲ 112,389
- Rank in TLD
- #764,121
▲ 32,668
- Referring Domains
- 111
▼ 4
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.9
- Subdomains
- 1
- Domain age
- 20 yr 9 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 32.9
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 28.4
- Referring Domains
- 111
- Linked Domains
- 1,432
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 3
10–19 19
20–29 38
30–39 22
40–49 13
50–59 9
60–69 3
70–79 2
80–89 1
90–100 1
Total 111
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| oup.com | 80.9 | #401 |
| upenn.edu | 78.7 | #620 |
| ghost.io | 73.3 | #1,796 |
| reading.ac.uk | 65.8 | #6,569 |
| openculture.com | 64.0 | #8,692 |
| globalvoices.org | 63.0 | #10,359 |
| omeka.net | 59.0 | #20,830 |
| archiveteam.org | 57.9 | #25,818 |
| kenyonreview.org | 53.2 | #56,805 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 7 Jan 2006
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2025
- Expires
- 7 Jan 2027 (63 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- ok
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- Webcentral Group Ltd
Subdomain
www.pierrejoris.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | pierrejoris.com | 60 | 173.236.246.137 |
| MX | pierrejoris.com | 60 | 0 mx2.mailchannels.net |
| MX | pierrejoris.com | 60 | 0 mx1.mailchannels.net |
| NS | pierrejoris.com | 14400 | ns1.dreamhost.com |
| NS | pierrejoris.com | 14400 | ns3.dreamhost.com |
| NS | pierrejoris.com | 14400 | ns2.dreamhost.com |
| SOA | pierrejoris.com | 60 | ns1.dreamhost.com. hostmaster.dreamhost.com. 2026092903 18165 600 1814400 60 |
| TXT | pierrejoris.com | 60 | v=spf1 mx include:netblocks.dreamhost.com include:relay.mailchannels.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.