philo.com
- Domain Power global ranking: #32,158
Its Domain Power Rank is relatively high. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.
- Global Rank
- #32,158
▼ 2,775
- Rank in TLD
- #14,689
▼ 1,311
- Referring Domains
- 946
▲ 28
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.4
- Subdomains
- 20
- Domain age
- 29 yr 11 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 29.4
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 25.1
- Referring Domains
- 946
- Linked Domains
- 78
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 130
10–19 245
20–29 175
30–39 134
40–49 106
50–59 83
60–69 46
70–79 22
80–89 2
90–100 3
Total 946
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| squarespace.com | 90.3 | #46 |
| stripe.com | 89.3 | #55 |
| businesswire.com | 82.1 | #308 |
| youradchoices.com | 79.7 | #527 |
| libsyn.com | 78.5 | #653 |
| entrepreneur.com | 78.3 | #670 |
| engadget.com | 76.8 | #901 |
| greenhouse.io | 76.4 | #966 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .com
- Registration date
- 7 Nov 1996
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2024
- Expires
- 6 Nov 2029 (1,097 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientTransferProhibited
- Registry
- VeriSign Global Registry Services
- Registrar
- NAMECHEAP INC
Subdomain
about.philo.comblog.philo.comcareers.philo.comkenny-s.cdn-cf.philo.comprod-s.cdn-cf.philo.comget.philo.comgo.philo.comhelp.philo.comidp.philo.comjobs.philo.comltu-dev.philo.comstatus.philo.comsupport.philo.comtry.philo.comwatch.philo.comweber.philo.comwpi.philo.comwww.philo.comcontent-us-east-2-fastly-b.www.philo.comstatic-us-east-2-fastly-a.www.philo.com
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | philo.com | 60 | 18.225.187.5 |
| A | philo.com | 60 | 3.130.80.172 |
| A | philo.com | 60 | 3.133.36.29 |
| A | philo.com | 60 | 3.136.225.101 |
| A | philo.com | 60 | 3.146.186.168 |
| A | philo.com | 60 | 18.218.123.214 |
| MX | philo.com | 300 | 1 aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | philo.com | 300 | 10 aspmx2.googlemail.com |
| MX | philo.com | 300 | 10 aspmx3.googlemail.com |
| MX | philo.com | 300 | 5 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com |
| MX | philo.com | 300 | 5 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com |
| NS | philo.com | 172800 | ns-1469.awsdns-55.org |
| NS | philo.com | 172800 | ns-1816.awsdns-35.co.uk |
| NS | philo.com | 172800 | ns-693.awsdns-22.net |
| NS | philo.com | 172800 | ns-70.awsdns-08.com |
| SOA | philo.com | 900 | ns-1816.awsdns-35.co.uk. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400 |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | B49E08D4A2 |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | MS=ms87333771 |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | TAILSCALE-Vju3X7S2f0jQmJU5iDYM |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | _globalsign-domain-verification=9UioyPO0_F2Epyd3gGV5_VklXzoibTukD_jkbZPw43 |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | adobe-idp-site-verification=c5655d0c26fc1c8d53687deca5963155e96b70794e88626e559da2b9fcc2013b |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | apple-domain-verification=aTxHBz5baGv0fVbn |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | atlassian-domain-verification=ON1f0+WCOcO7p0eExJkwe0r72X10FgQZqMY/TwbWCw/IUiLb2iinTlxzsdD2o3a2 |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | cursor-domain-verification-xzjhe3=3foTWlvWhIzPyLJud1UiyoOpn |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | google-site-verification=U_hko0bAbjegQ5f9Dh9HTFbNWO1yUtXIokfY_J2JtqY |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | notion-domain-verification=7p2BIuKAsXGHaZpWqOZNIJlGOMUCVrLYCsSjyK3jVpR |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | parallels-domain-verification=bfd159bc4ff64f2797c230355b217cba80e579a1f95e4271b7d717984186cc93 |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | stripe-verification=79f582e0e1a00d6877018c79fc0868e8b18cdcbdc7e0bea60bb41857da28473b |
| TXT | philo.com | 300 | v=spf1 include:%{i}._ip.%{h}._ehlo.%{d}._spf.vali.email ~all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Warning
The SPF check could not be completed because of too many DNS references or macros.
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.