Skip to content

pgcon.org

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. This domain was registered at least 20 years ago. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data.

Domain Power Rank
48.6
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#123,205

▼ 36,595

Rank in TLD
#14,396

▼ 4,373

Referring Domains
186

▲ 4

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
42.1
Subdomains
4
Domain age
20 yr 0 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
github.com93.6#19
wikipedia.org91.8#34
yandex.ru90.3#47
bit.ly88.4#67
apache.org86.6#105
openstreetmap.org82.1#304
python.org82.0#318
aliyun.com79.6#538
ycombinator.com78.0#705
dev.to77.3#807

Basic Information

TLD
.org
Registration date
13 Oct 2006
Last updated
14 Jul 2026
Expires
13 Oct 2029 (1,073 days remaining)
Registrar
GANDI SAS

Subdomain

beta.pgcon.orglists.pgcon.orgpapers.pgcon.orgwww.pgcon.org

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Apgcon.org3600162.208.116.70
AAAApgcon.org36002610:1c1:0:4:ac3b:877f:5df7:583b
MXpgcon.org18010 in1-smtp.messagingengine.com
MXpgcon.org18020 in2-smtp.messagingengine.com
NSpgcon.org3600ns3.unixathome.org
NSpgcon.org3600ns2.unixathome.org
NSpgcon.org3600ns1.unixathome.org
SOApgcon.org3600ns1.unixathome.org. soa.unixathome.org. 2018041697 10800 1800 1209600 86400
TXTpgcon.org3600v=spf1 ip4:162.208.116.70 ip6:2610:1c1:0:4::6 ip4:199.233.228.194 ip4:162.208.116.77 ip4:199.233.231.200 ip4:199.233.228.195 ip4:162.208.116.66 include:spf.messagingengine.com ?all
TXTpgcon.org3600keybase-site-verification=S-mMSLqB-Fg_20eNX_fGMR_KHpD_zqILG_gIFAlknCY

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Warning

This SPF policy uses +all or has no all mechanism. Check whether the sender restrictions are appropriate, and consider ~all or -all if needed.

DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.