pasewalk.de
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #913,958
▲ 1,413
- Rank in TLD
- #39,994
▲ 1,476
- Referring Domains
- 141
▼ 1
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.1
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- No data
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 27.1
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.3
- Referring Domains
- 141
- Linked Domains
- 202
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 14
10–19 37
20–29 36
30–39 25
40–49 20
50–59 3
60–69 4
70–79 1
80–89 0
90–100 1
Total 141
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| wikipedia.org | 91.8 | #34 |
| ihk.de | 73.9 | #1,591 |
| adac.de | 69.1 | #3,988 |
| berliner-zeitung.de | 64.9 | #7,526 |
| wikivoyage.org | 60.6 | #15,751 |
| genealogy.net | 60.2 | #16,813 |
| meinestadt.de | 59.1 | #20,517 |
| wzp.pl | 52.2 | #67,132 |
| auf-nach-mv.de | 51.1 | #80,596 |
| hochschule-stralsund.de | 48.5 | #125,348 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .deGermany
- Last updated
- 27 May 2026
- Domain statuses
- active
- Registry
- DENIC eG
Subdomain
ansichten.pasewalk.decloud.pasewalk.dewww.pasewalk.de
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | pasewalk.de | 240 | 136.243.123.105 |
| MX | pasewalk.de | 240 | 10 mx04.mvnet.de |
| MX | pasewalk.de | 240 | 10 mx03.mvnet.de |
| NS | pasewalk.de | 240 | dns.dns4.de |
| NS | pasewalk.de | 240 | dns.dns2.de |
| NS | pasewalk.de | 240 | dns.dns1.de |
| NS | pasewalk.de | 240 | dns.dns3.de |
| SOA | pasewalk.de | 240 | dns.dns1.de. hostmaster.domainbestellsystem.de. 2026110301 600 300 604800 240 |
| TXT | pasewalk.de | 240 | v=spf1 ip4:136.243.123.105 ip4:91.203.207.222 include:_spf.dvz-mv.de -all |
| TXT | pasewalk.de | 240 | _acme-challenge.mdm.schule.pasewalk.de |
| TXT | pasewalk.de | 240 | apple-domain-verification=Qx14oCFwGC7TtqZU |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Not configured
DMARC is not configured.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.