Skip to content

parametric.press

  • Domain Power ranking within .press: #21

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate. Links from multiple referring domains appear in the observed data. This domain was registered at least three years ago.

Domain Power Rank
45.2
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#216,144

▲ 5,626

Rank in TLD
#21

▲ 6

Referring Domains
104

▼ 4

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
36.1
Subdomains
0
Domain age
8 yr 0 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
wordpress.org93.7#18
substack.com84.4#173
cloudinary.com84.0#191
cmu.edu79.4#555
washington.edu77.0#868
stackoverflow.blog76.9#879
jetbrains.com76.5#944
research.google72.9#1,968
pitt.edu72.4#2,172
uxdesign.cc69.6#3,650

Basic Information

TLD
.press
Registration date
10 Oct 2018
Last updated
16 Sept 2026
Expires
10 Oct 2027 (339 days remaining)
Registrar
Name.com, Inc.

Subdomain

No Observed Data

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
Aparametric.press1800216.198.79.65
Aparametric.press180064.29.17.65
MXparametric.press601 aspmx.l.google.com
MXparametric.press6010 alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
MXparametric.press6010 alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
MXparametric.press605 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
MXparametric.press605 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
NSparametric.press86400ns1.vercel-dns.com
NSparametric.press86400ns2.vercel-dns.com
SOAparametric.press3600ns1.vercel-dns.com. hostmaster.nsone.net. 1655276225 43200 7200 1209600 600
TXTparametric.press60google-site-verification=7yR9koXP0ipFJfiyT9K2ofkZzO3C5nf_oWq7TdyD9uU
TXTparametric.press60google-site-verification=A6yucqzzxXtuAWq4EVgFf_ac07B_LDfnS1k_FB8huL8
CAAparametric.press600 issue "letsencrypt.org"
CAAparametric.press600 issue "pki.goog"
CAAparametric.press600 issue "sectigo.com"

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Not configured

No matching DNS record was found.

DMARC
Not configured

DMARC is not configured.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.