paperdigest.org
Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.
- Global Rank
- #183,752
▲ 20,773
- Rank in TLD
- #21,153
▲ 2,018
- Referring Domains
- 216
▲ 11
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Subdomains
- 3
- Domain age
- 8 yr 6 mo
Link Overview
- Avg. Referrer Power Rank
- 28.3
- Median Referrer Power Rank
- 24.2
- Referring Domains
- 216
- Linked Domains
- 1,571
Referring Domains by Power Rank
0–9 42
10–19 49
20–29 50
30–39 24
40–49 13
50–59 13
60–69 12
70–79 7
80–89 4
90–100 2
Total 216
Referring Domains
| Referring domain | Power Rank | Global Rank |
|---|---|---|
| google.com | 99.8 | #1 |
| github.com | 93.6 | #19 |
| nih.gov | 87.1 | #91 |
| ibm.com | 84.7 | #158 |
| substack.com | 84.4 | #173 |
| nvidia.com | 81.0 | #396 |
| hku.hk | 78.2 | #683 |
| georgetown.edu | 74.6 | #1,397 |
| clickup.com | 73.2 | #1,851 |
| anu.edu.au | 71.7 | #2,476 |
Basic Information
- TLD
- .org
- Registration date
- 4 May 2018
- Last updated
- 12 Aug 2026
- Expires
- 4 May 2028 (546 days remaining)
- Domain statuses
- clientDeleteProhibited clientRenewProhibited clientTransferProhibited clientUpdateProhibited
- Registry
- Public Interest Registry (PIR)
- Registrar
- GoDaddy.com, LLC
Subdomain
resources.paperdigest.orgwww.paperdigest.orgwwws.paperdigest.org
DNS
| Type | Name | TTL | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | paperdigest.org | 600 | 13.59.1.3 |
| MX | paperdigest.org | 3600 | 10 mx1-us1.ppe-hosted.com |
| MX | paperdigest.org | 3600 | 20 mx2-us1.ppe-hosted.com |
| NS | paperdigest.org | 3600 | ns15.domaincontrol.com |
| NS | paperdigest.org | 3600 | ns16.domaincontrol.com |
| SOA | paperdigest.org | 3600 | ns15.domaincontrol.com. dns.jomax.net. 2026092801 28800 7200 604800 600 |
| TXT | paperdigest.org | 3600 | google-site-verification=Xu5jAM1GZ2uM1YAS97sBd03TemqVDU4oXbpUsCatidI |
| TXT | paperdigest.org | 3600 | MS=ms10302947 |
| TXT | paperdigest.org | 3600 | v=spf1 a:dispatch-us.ppe-hosted.com include:secureserver.net -all |
Email Authentication
- MX
- Valid
- SPF
- Valid
- DMARC
- Valid
DMARC is set to p=reject, asking receiving servers to reject messages that fail authentication.
Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.