Skip to content

ous.ac.jp

Its Domain Power Rank is moderate.

Domain Power Rank
48.3
About Domain Power Rank
Global Rank
#128,522

▲ 2,582

Rank in TLD
#3,325

▲ 199

Referring Domains
708

-

Avg. Referrer Power Rank
28.6
Subdomains
109
Domain age
33 yr 2 mo

Referring Domains

Top referring domains
Referring domain Power Rank Global Rank
google.com99.8#1
wikipedia.org91.8#34
hatena.ne.jp82.7#270
mdpi.com80.3#459
atlassian.net79.5#543
fc2.com77.6#755
umn.edu76.7#913
mynavi.jp76.5#954
ubc.ca74.2#1,493
jst.go.jp73.9#1,573

Basic Information

Registration date
30 Aug 1993
Last updated
31 Aug 2026
Expires
31 Aug 2027 (299 days remaining)
Domain statuses
Connected (2027/08/31)

Subdomain

www.archi.ous.ac.jpud037.are.ous.ac.jpwww.are.ous.ac.jpbio62.gds.big.ous.ac.jphad0.big.ous.ac.jphos0.big.ous.ac.jpwww.big.ous.ac.jpwww.bme.ous.ac.jpfm.center.ous.ac.jpmag.center.ous.ac.jppeach.center.ous.ac.jpwww.center.ous.ac.jpbutuyu2.chem.ous.ac.jpwww.chem.ous.ac.jpwww.dac.ous.ac.jpwww.dap.ous.ac.jpwww2.dap.ous.ac.jpweb.das.ous.ac.jpwww.das.ous.ac.jpwww.dbc.ous.ac.jp

DNS

DNS
Type Name TTL Value
MXous.ac.jp8640010 aspmx.l.google.com
NSous.ac.jp86400ns04c.ous.ac.jp
NSous.ac.jp86400dns-x.sinet.ad.jp
NSous.ac.jp86400ns04a.ous.ac.jp
SOAous.ac.jp86400ns04a.ous.ac.jp. netadmin.center.ous.ac.jp. 2026090401 3600 900 3600000 86400
TXTous.ac.jp360090A6C05A7E0D6B94330993C66BE33FB1
TXTous.ac.jp3600google-site-verification=KfNEr-g3NqFek7TexhWtfvK25YPnl6-IhKXxzi5sceE
TXTous.ac.jp3600v=spf1 +ip4:150.55.6.185/32 +ip4:150.55.5.181/32 +ip4:133.217.192.19/32 +ip4:133.217.192.20/32 +ip4:133.217.192.21/32 +ip4:133.217.192.22/32 include:_spf.google.com include:digital-knowledge.sm.air.ne.jp ~all
TXTous.ac.jp3600MS=ms80294911

Email Authentication

MX
Valid
SPF
Valid
DMARC
Warning

DMARC is set to p=none, which does not ask receiving servers to quarantine or reject failing messages.

Some information is cached or comes from our own analysis, so it may not be current or complete. Our link analysis does not cover every link on the web. Metrics are based on our own methodology and should not be taken as definitive assessments of a domain’s or service’s quality or trustworthiness.